Latest Post

After ‘unsatisfactory’ response, IHC to indict Imran Khan in contempt of court case in two weeks Britain’s Queen Elizabeth dies peacefully at Scottish home aged 96 Imran Khan appears before IHC in contempt case PM criticizes Imran Khan saying he is out to undermine Pakistan Contempt case: Imran Khan ‘deeply regrets unintentional’ utterances against judge
Spread the love

The Senate passed on Thursday the National Accountability (Second Amendment) Bill despite strong protest by the Opposition, who alleged that the government meant to damage the anti-graft body to facilitate its leadership.

However, the authorities strenuously denied these charges, emphasizing that the revisions had been in public interest and so have been required to be enacted the same day the House convened after a two-day break.

The Opposition commenced the protest in the House when Minister of State for Law and Justice Shahadat Awan moved a action looking for suspension of guidelines for introducing the bill, while opposition participants shouted “no, no” and beat desks to impede the process. Three amendments submitted by JI Senator Mushtaq Ahmad were rejected by using a majority vote amid the chaos.

Rising from his seat, PTI Senator Shibli Faraz referred to that the bill’s clear aim was once to render the NAB powerless, including that it used to be being performed with the aid of a authorities dealing with big corruption accusations, with 60% of its cupboard participants on bail.

The legislator claimed the incumbent coalition authorities had no ethical justification for passing legislation that would immediately gain it, and vowed to oppose it tooth and nail.

Shibli was supported by JI Senator Mushtaq Ahmed, who argued that the bill was intended to take effect in 1999, and that a criminal law cannot be retroactively applied.

Furthermore, Ahmed highlighted that under an amendment, the NAB would be unable to prosecute people who whiten their black money via amnesty programmes, since this would obviously give a back door for unscrupulous mafias, criminals, and dacoits.

However, Shahadat Awan stated that he could reveal that these adjustments have been made in the public interest. Despite the minister’s clarification, the opposition senators rose from their seats following the voice vote, chanted loud slogans, swarmed round the Senate Chairman’s podium, and threw shredded copies of the agenda. The opposition senators walked out of the House after registering their protest.

The government’s and opposition’s renewed tug of war over the Election Commission of Pakistan’s recent decision in the PTI foreign funding case additionally made its way into the House. Ex-Senate Chairman and PPP stalwart Mian Raza Rabbani stated that the Election Commission determined in its judgement that the PTI got funding from banned sources. He stated that the PTI bought donations from about 350 foreign companies and that various extra accounts are still hidden.

In response to the query of whether the government will submit a reference in search of a ban on PTI under Article 17, Rabbani reiterated that it was once up to the government to pick out between the legal and constitutional avenues.

As a pinnacle constitutional expert, he argued that the government should go towards Imran Khan under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution for blatantly signing wrong certificates with annual declarations of the party’s assets for 5 consecutive years.

He remarked, “You can make a mistake once or twice however no longer for 4 or 5 years in a row. There need to additionally be criminal investigations towards PTI leaders who managed hidden and disowned accounts.’’

In response to Rabbani’s speech, PTI Senator from Lahore Ejaz Chaudhry criticised the ECP’s choice and expressed regret that several overseas Pakistanis have been incorrectly depicted as foreigners in it, despite the fact that Nawaz Sharif had obtained funds from Osama Bin Laden to destabilise Benazir Bhutto’s government..

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.